🔙 Back to index

"Canadian Queer Identity with James Somerton" Transcript

22 Aug 2023

A live chat put on by the Ottawa Public Library (Biblio publique d'Ottawa) featuring James and Nick. (Transcript by Malia @catfishingwords, mirrored)

Live streamed by the Ottawa Public Library (Biblio publique d'Ottawa)

(Transcript Mirror)

Finished

You can view the archive of this video on YouTube

Transcribed by Malia @catfishingwords on cohost (direct link to original).
Formatted by Tustin2121.
Fact-checked by Malia @catfishingwords.


Video transcript is on the left. Misinformation is highlighted For more info, see how to read this site

Source (Author, 2000)

Fact-checking commentary is on the right for comparison.

Auto-text is cleaned up somewhat to remove excessive "um"s and vocal tics.

Tustin2121

The following is a transcript originally published here. It has been copied and adapted to the format used on this site. I have further attempted to clean up and annotate. This transcript was last updated 2023-12-30.


Join YouTuber and independent filmmaker James Somerton for a discussion with his podcast partner, author N. T. Herrgott, about what it’s like to grow up queer in Canada with an American-dominated media space. Bring your questions for our speakers for this live event, which will also be live streamed on our YouTube channel.

James Somerton began making videos as a pastime, and eventually shifted into full-time content creation in 2020. Since then, James has launched a successful IndieGoGo campaign for start-up capital to make films under his indie studio: Telos Pictures, with the first feature “Anti Social” due out In 2024.

An advocate for the importance of producing content outside of corporate oversight, Nick Herrgott develops content with a focus on media literacy and social analysis. Under the pen name N.T Herrgott, Nick has published Gentleman’s Club, a novel about a queer teenaged superhero.

Malia @catfishingwords

There were several parts I had trouble comprehending when audience members spoke because they either didn't have a microphone or the audio quality was much poorer than for James and Nick, and so I apologize for the incomplete nature of this transcript and if parts don't make sense when that occurs. I do not do this sort of thing professionally so I also apologize for any general difficulties in reading it.

I also attempted to fact-check every statement that wasn't just a subjective opinion or feeling, including references to Canadian cultural context. Some of these were blurry but I figured it was worth doing. I also struggled to find certain information, especially if it was advanced industry know-how on certain topics. Honestly, I didn't wish to spend too much time on this and I would say my research was relatively shallow. I'm also not a filmmaker and I'm not Canadian, so I'm sure there's gaps. I apologize for that.

My TL;DR overall impression: This talk isn’t completely full of misinformation but they do make statements that are misleading or incorrect in order to paint Canada as actively hostile to its domestic creatives and independent media production, especially in the face of American cultural hegemony (not to imply that this isn’t an issue, just that some of their evidence is literally incorrect). One statement/anecdote was definitely plagiarized (a new low for something that’s a semi-improvised public talk), Ctrl+F for “werewolf” to find that.

 

Malia @catfishingwords

[I am skipping the introduction by the facilitator because I can't hear it well enough to transcribe and it's likely negligible.]

Okay um, so one of the things we get asked a lot on in comment sections and live streams and everything, when people discover that we're Canadian is, which is, they're always shocked by, is that—

You do have you do have a very American accent.

I did that on purpose, is why don't we ever talk about any Canadian content, or being Canadian, or queer Canadian stuff, and usually my answer is that there's not a lot to talk about but really my answer is Americans don't care and that's the majority of YouTube. So I figured today would actually be a good time to kind of focus on that a bit more um, because as Canadian queer content creators and in the process of becoming Canadian queer filmmakers that's a very, like, important thing for me is, you know, there's…

For me anyway, maybe I'm just completely underexposed to it, there's not as big a queer Canadian voice especially in like traditional filmmaking and in television and stuff like that as there is from America. Even if you watch things on like CBC, uh like Schitt's Creek, which we'll get into, that does have, like, major queer characters and storylines, it doesn't seem to get as much attention as a minor queer character on something on CBS, or something like that. And so I figured we would talk about that and why that's kind of frustrating, and how we got there, and maybe what we can do about it?

Oh yeah, whatever, what better to talk about in the nation's capital, is about being gay in Canada.

Yeah. [Both laugh]

Uh, this is the place to have that discussion. Um, so this is something that James and I have regularly talked about on our own, uh very frequently is just this, this discussion about why, to use layman’s terms, we know basically nothing about Canadian gay rights in general. Uh, we really have to struggle to kind of think about what we know and even do, like, research. Where, when it comes to American dates like, events and dates we got that on top of our head.

Oh yeah, we can give you a blow by blow of the Stonewall Riots, but ask us about like, queer rights in Canada, it's like ah, ahh, Ginger Snaps came out from like ‘99 I think. And that's that's about it.

Malia @catfishingwords

It came out in 2000. (This is a benign mistake, I’m just nitpicking here.)

This is less about specifically Canadian media and more about, like, the discussion of Canadian identity. Um, but through these discussions that we have, we, I, I certainly have the idea that media certainly plays a role in that, uh, and a big role, um, and I think especially just because like, when something important happens, the modern industrial creative thinks “I should make a movie about this.” And that happens a lot for American historical events, but not so much for Canadian ones, uh, for a consolation, convolution? Is that a real word?

I don't think it is.

It is now. Uh, of reasons, uh, a convolution of reasons. I coined it here. Um, and I, it does start with just the structure of how media is produced, created, and distributed on this, um side of the border. Yeah, I was going to use a different word, but that's probably better.

Yeah and like, having, you know, come from a film background, it is sort of um, the, there's a weird relationship between like Canada and media, and specifically with America's media, because we are so close in culture and in geography that American media just kind of like funnels its way into Canada whether we like it or not. And so when for instance, uh, in when uh, gay marriage became legal in Canada, there wasn't a whole lot of talk about it among people that I knew at the time, and I was a teenager at the time, everyone knew I was gay but I didn't know if anyone else was. Um, but even among the adults and stuff, there was no big drama about it where I lived, there was no discussion of it. It was just something that happened.

Whereas, two, I think it was two years before, um, you know, San Francisco had started issuing marriage licenses to gay couples, and it was the biggest thing, America was going to melt down, the whole world was going to end, and everyone in the whole world--

Malia @catfishingwords

Canada legalized same-sex marriage in 2005.

https://development.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/same-sex-marriage-in-canada

San Francisco did grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples in 2004.

https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/lesbian-and-gay-couples-san-francisco-are-granted-marriage-licenses

[unintelligible, something about “hurricanes”] on that.

Yeah [laughs]. And it's sort of like, come to my realization lately that, at least for me, and this might be different from other people, for other people I hope it is, is that when something important happens in Canada, it's almost, even as Canadians, we're kind of like “Oh that happened.”

Yeah.

And when something even minorly of any importance happens in the United States it's, obviously, it makes the news in Canada, it makes the news globally. We as a country I feel like, even like the queer population, we're on the edge of our seats waiting to find out when's America going to get, you know, same-sex marriage when we had already had it for several years beforehand. And it seems like much of the world was the same way, and I think it is because of this American dominated media that just kind of funnels its way into Canada, like.

Yeah, you used that word “funnel” earlier and I maybe, think of like, it's a bit different here because I've talked to…one of that things about being someone who is tangential to an influencer, um, I still don't like using that term.

Strong word

I don't like using that term, um who do I influence? Um… as I've had some discussions with people in Europe, and the, the idea of America being this media behemoth is not exclusive to Canada, that, that's everywhere. But it was hard to kind of articulate to him exactly what that means to be like right next to it.

Um, and in this specific instance, it's a friend of mine who is in the Netherlands, um, he was talking about uh, German media passing into the Netherlands, and uh, the things that he was talking about didn't quite line up with the way things exist in Canada, um, whereas our media was kind of is, you know, dwarfed next to what America puts out, at the rate it puts it out.

Um, and that that's for a number of reasons why Canada is in this very unique position as being a same language country next to the world's largest media producer, um, because for all Germany might produce a lot of me—would output a lot more media than smaller countries around it, uh the Netherlands is only, Germany has 4 times the population of the Netherlands and America has 10 times the population of Canada.

Malia @catfishingwords

I couldn’t find anything on how much imported German media makes up Netherland’s media consumption. I don't think Nick is lying, to be clear, I just have no info on hand.

In terms of population, the stated ratio is about correct (though underestimating it a bit): Demographics of Germany and Demography of the Netherlands.

This is approximately correct, it’s a little smaller than 10:1 as a ratio though currently.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/230927/dq230927a-eng.htm

https://www.census.gov/popclock/

Closing in on twelve now, I think.

Um, which is sizable like, for every one Canadian, there are every, there are ten Americans and they consume a lot of media, and we consume a lot of their media. Um, so just in terms of just the sheer volume of stuff, that not only there's demand for in America, but the output for it, because America just doesn't create media for Americans, it creates media for the whole world. I mean international box offices are a big deal, um.

And it's not just America, there's lots of countries, um specifically the ones that come to mind right away are the UK and Japan, they basically create media for the whole world whereas Canadian media is very Canadian-centric, like as someone who has gone to film school in Canada and tried to get movies made the traditional way in Canada, it is nigh impossible to get something made in Canada without it being the most Canadian thing ever made.

Malia @catfishingwords

There are multiple federal public resources for financing filmmaking in Canada, even within singular organizations (Canada Council for the Arts, Canada Media Fund, Telefilm Canada, and other organizations I’m missing), as well as tax credits. Eligibility requirements seem to differ between organizations (such as independence of production) but primarily focus on production companies being based in Canada and controlled by Canadian citizens.

I’m not sure what distinguishes Quebecois public funding practices besides residing in Quebec, but maybe I’m missing something.

https://www.northbridgeconsultants.com/blog/2022/08/30/a-closer-look-at-film-and-television-funding-in-canada-cmf-and-telefilm-financing/

https://www.canada.ca/en/services/culture/arts-media/film-video.html

https://telefilm.ca/en/programmes/development-program

https://cmf-fmc.ca/our-programs/

https://apply.canadacouncil.ca/AreYouEligible.aspx

https://www.calq.gouv.qc.ca/en/about/frequently-asked-questions/grant-program-for-artists

There are currently 7 Canadian films (pending one for this year that would bring the total to 8) that have been nominated for Best International Feature Film. One has won. All of these were categorized as being at least partially in French and directed by Canadians who were raised in Quebec.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_submissions_for_the_Academy_Award_for_Best_International_Feature_Film

The qualifications for a film to be eligible for Best International Feature nominations are “a feature-length motion picture (over 40 minutes) produced outside the United States of America and its territories with a predominantly (more than 50%) non-English dialogue track.” So it’s not surprising that most Canadian nominations would be Quebec-originated given the non-English language requirement, since the majority of other Canadian films are mostly in English.

https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/95aa_international_feature.pdf

And whereas, you know, in the United States, there will be movies made in the United States that take place in every country in the whole world, there'll be movies made in the UK that that happens with, in Australia that that happens with um, whereas here it's very Canadian-centric in order to get the money from the federal government grants and stuff like that. Um, Quebec kind of has its own system and that's why a lot of movies that are produced in Quebec will actually be Oscar-nominated, they will get nominated for best foreign feature [Best International Feature, formerly known as Best Foreign Language Film] and things like that whereas movies produced basically everywhere else in Canada are flatly ignored in the United States.

Something like Schitt’s Creek basically became popular in the United States by accident because it was acquired by Netflix, people in the US started watching it on Netflix, started falling in love with the characters, and the story, and the world, and everything, and they had no idea that it was Canadian. And the show, even in the end season, you know, they go to what is ostensibly Toronto or New York, but they don't say what city it is when they go to kind of pitch their idea for uh, spinning off the motel.

Malia @catfishingwords

Schitt’s Creek was pitched to and significantly funded by CBC, but was also funded and distributed by Pop (formerly known as the TV Guide Network), an American cable channel.

https://www.vulture.com/2020/04/schitts-creek-netflix-pop-success-story.html

Schitt’s Creek’s popularity booming after its distribution on Netflix began seems to be widely accepted knowledge.

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2020/09/schitts-creek-emmys-when-final-season-netflix

Schitt’s Creek’s setting was apparently intentionally made somewhat ambiguous, though it had many Canada-specific traits and was eventually confirmed as Canadian-set in 2018.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/davidmack/schitts-creek-us-canada-setting-location-dan-levy

https://www.reddit.com/r/SchittsCreek/comments/j6zrtt/all_the_canadianisms_ive_noticed_on_the_show/

And you know, that's on purpose, because if they said we're going to Toronto to talk to these rich people, a huge swamp of the American audience just clicks off.

Malia @catfishingwords

This anecdotal evidence and just my subjective opinion, but I just think this is silly to say. No one I have ever talked to or seen or read has commented that media like Scott Pilgrim and Turning Red are too Canadian to get, or have gotten so confused about Toronto that they had to stop engaging.

So we're in a very interesting position as Canadian creators, and I know in James and I mean, like we as Canadians who create things, because there are a lot of us. Most of us end up going to, I'm not good with microphones, but most of us end up uh, going to America to make, to make content, um.

Malia @catfishingwords

As noted before, I can't find any evidence on the funding claims he makes here at all for Titanic or Avatar, and they just seem dubious to me in general.

https://twitter.com/catfishingwords/status/1734016236797976818?t=WT_lSjOAusss5mKzp0N0SA&s=19

https://twitter.com/catfishingwords/status/1734016924928159863?t=QYNIUQu0rsZMc1sTPONTaQ&s=19

Also as someone else noted, Cameron would've had a first ideas/development deal with Fox in place at the time when he pitched Titanic.

https://twitter.com/HowardtheDuck95/status/1734068563504202146?t=iQ9_RLnb4B0fGxIs6sZsmQ&s=19

https://filmstories.co.uk/features/titanic-and-how-paramount-pictures-got-an-incredible-deal-on-the-worlds-biggest-film/

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-04-22-ca-500-story.html

Yeah, like something that Americans don't really, they might know it but they don't know it, is two of the highest grossing movies ever made were made by a Canadian who actually tried to get them financed in Canada, uh this is both Avatar movies and Titanic, but the Canadian government wasn't interesting, and interested in forking over you know, hundreds of millions of dollars to James Cameron to get these things made. So he went through the traditional studio system and made himself Fox, and I think Paramount—

A small fortune. And now Disney— A sizable fortune.

A huge fortune! And the Canadian populace lost out on that, and we lost out on the ability to say like, that's a Canadian movie because although it was made by Canadian filmmakers, it wasn't Canadian enough. And so we're in this weird position where specifically with the film industry, the federal government does seem to work against—

Malia @catfishingwords

Funny enough, this does seem to be an issue, but mainly regarding streaming and algorithm regulations in Canada.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/why-avatar-is-not-considered-canadian-by-ottawa

And it's that phrase “Canadian enough” that really bothers me because one would assume that media content made by a Canadian would qualify as a, as Canadian content because it's content being made by someone who has grown up with the cultural sensibilities of this nation um, where many, we’re many different people but like across the country like, one of that version is Canadian. And the movie, Arrival, uh, you were telling me the other day was supposed to take place in Canada.

Yeah, Denis Villeneuve, who is from Quebec, wanted that to take place in Ontario and he wanted it to make it through the Canadian system, so that he could employ Canadians and stuff like that, give back to the system that helped him get to where he was. And the federal government turned him down for the financing, so it ended up taking place in you know, generic flat American state.

Malia @catfishingwords

Why would he say that. It’s so easy to fact-check.

https://twitter.com/catfishingwords/status/1734015426236166513?t=Pu_aVItx4GIHz6Lf55kdCg&s=19

https://montrealgazette.com/entertainment/movies/denis-villeneuve-credits-quebecois-film-scene-for-arrivals-oscar-nominations

So, so yeah, already like out of the gate, Canadian creators are kind of kneecapped as far as, you know, they might want to express your Canadian identity, but you can't do too much of that that because then it's not going to be accessible outside of the country. But the only way to kind of make it accessible outside of this country is to make it more vague, which, you know, doesn't really fulfill the qualifications of wanting to express a sense of what it's like to grow up in this country.

So um, there isn't a whole lot of ways for Canadians to reinforce their own national identity because content made here has to compete with content made in America, and they can produce more of it, and have, they have the the infrastructure to promote it um, at a greater rate than we can promote it here. Um, so Canadian identity connectors get, gets swept under the rug in a lot of situations. Now to have Canadians—

Oddly, you know, as even as the government tries to, you know, create a system where the Canadian media industry is built to enhance Canadian identity. it actually goes in the opposite direction because of the constraints put on it.

Yeah that's what I was trying to say, thank you, my words weren't working. Um uh, like you, yeah, the, the need to make Canadian content for Canadians is getting uh, squashed because we can't, we just can't compete with national content with American content.

Yeah um, because Canada kind of acts in a way that um, New Zealand acts with Australia. Australia has a film production industry, New Zealand has a film service industry, where Australian productions will go to New Zealand because of tax breaks and such, but also because New Zealand has a lot of people who are professionals who can work on the film sets for less money, and that's basically how Canada works for the United States.

We have a service industry that is much more popular among American filmmakers than a production industry. We do have a production industry that does make Canadian content, but when you hear of a movie being made in Canada, it's not likely going to be about Canadian issues, it's not going to star Canadians not likely um, probably not going to be written or directed by a Canadian, and we promise this is all going to come back to queer issues eventually.

Malia @catfishingwords

Canada being considered an extension of Hollywood film production is true.

https://avison-young-markets.foleon.com/ca-toronto/canadas-film-industry/canadas-summary/

https://www.mpa-canada.org/research_docs/profile-2022-economic-report-on-the-screen-based-media-production-industry-in-canada/

Uh, well, it also limits the ability for Canadian creators to make content that isn't explicitly about Canadian, Canadian issues, or Canada itself. Like there's a diminished possibility for fantasy, or science fiction, or other genre content coming out of Canada, because you know, Star Wars doesn't take place in America, it doesn't take place in the UK, and yet that got made, but for the Canadian government to give a sign off to Canadian content it needs to be directly kind of tied to this idea of Canada.

Malia @catfishingwords

I don’t know why they’re implying Star Wars received direct US federal funding?

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/12/star-wars-george-lucas-independent-film

Also again, and maybe this is something I don’t understand the complexities of, most Canadian public AV production grants/funds/etc. mainly require that productions be owned by Canadians, have significant Canadian production crew involvement, and be primarily filmed in Canada. More abstract content guidelines exist but are more focused on broader genre requirements.

https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/cancon/c_cdn.htm

https://cmf-fmc.ca/document/early-stage-development-guidelines/

https://telefilm.ca/en/we-finance-and-support/our-programs/feature-films

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/funding/cavco-tax-credits/canadian-film-video-production/application-guidelines.html#a1

Yeah, like maple-leaf shaped starships.

[Laughing, mumbling “maple leaf starships”?] Um, so uh already kind of out the door creators are kneecapped. Um, now to be Canadian is one thing, but to be queer and Canadian is an entirely different thing. Like that you've got even more of a kind of diminished capacity to make media as it is and like I said earlier if you want to commemorate something important that happened, you make a movie about it so that just tends not to happen, especially for queer Canadians.

Yeah like there's, it, it actually honestly kind of shocks me that there has not been, you know, obviously not a Hollywood movie, but a Canadian movie that has been made, [glances at cellphone] apparently “Likely Fraud” is calling me, um, about the fact that in 1969 in Canada we decriminalized same-sex sex. That did not happen in the United States until 2003. So it took decades and decades in the difference between that happening between the two countries.

But I think you would be hard-pressed to be able, asking a queer person in the United States like what year did, uh I can't remember what it was called now uh, Lawrence v Texas what year did that go through the Supreme Court they can tell you it's 2003. If you ask you know, most queer Canadians what year was um homosexuality decriminalized in Canada I don't think most of us could tell you

Malia @catfishingwords

These are generally true facts, though with some complexities and nuances.

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/the-1969-amendment-and-the-de-criminalization-of-homosexuality

https://nowtoronto.com/news/homosexuality-canada-pride-1969/

https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/lawrence-v-texas-18180149.php

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/21/us/politics/state-anti-sodomy-laws.html

Like I had to look up the date for that. I’m sorry.

I know that before Stonewall uh, there were several riots in America that had several queer bar, uh, raid riots that happened in America, and some in Canada too even earlier. Um, and it's also not like Canada doesn't have any shortage of weird queer stories in our history like—

Malia @catfishingwords

It is true various LGBTQ+ bar raids occurred in the US before Stonewall (1969).

https://guides.loc.gov/lgbtq-studies/stonewall-era

https://www.advocate.com/politics/2017/3/01/30-infamous-police-raids-gay-bars-and-bathhouses#rebelltitem27

Various raids of gay establishments such as bars, nightclubs, and bathhouses did take place before 1969. However, it seems to be generally accepted though that the first public LGBTQ+ protest in Canada was in 1971, but maybe I'm missing something.

https://www.queerevents.ca/queer-history/resistance

https://activehistory.ca/blog/2021/03/03/29902/

https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/coderre-apologizes-for-police-raids-on-gay-bars-between-60s-and-90s

Well there's a shockingly undocumented history of police violence against queer people in Canada that goes back like, just as back as far back as United States one does, and we and we all know about the Stonewall riots and everything, we don't know about the riots that happen in Montreal, we don't know about the riots that happened in Toronto, and we don't talk about these things and it might be that we want to kind of act like you know, Canada is above it all and that “Oh, there are no you know big issues in Canada” when it comes to you know like uh race relations, and uh indigenous rights, and queers’ rights and stuff like that like “Oh we figured that out long ago we don't have to talk about it now,” even though it's like no, no.

There are interesting Canadian queer figures and Canadian queer stories like the uh, Scottish werewolf story.

Malia @catfishingwords

Let me preface this now that the tale they’re about to “retell” is not a genuine legend or folklore.

Yeah!

Which, I'm surprised, but like I find it so hard to find information about that, but once again like you know being Canada, being in Canada, um—

Malia @catfishingwords

So this is actually a subplot of a queer horror novel, Red X, by a gay, Canadian writer, David Demchuk (published in 2021). There are elements of real Canadian history present, such as Alexander Wood, a Canadian merchant, originally from Scotland, who was caught up in a sex scandal and accused of sodomy in 1810. But the “twinkie boyfriend” and werewolf elements are fictional and created by Demchuk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Wood_(merchant)

http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/wood_alexander_7E.html

https://twitter.com/catfishingwords/status/1734240466026320138?t=hSSw1m4q1ZjBY2ck7b-pbA&s=19

https://twitter.com/catfishingwords/status/1734291999619195124?t=nJ52leczI7CbKBmmU4MO8w&s=19

To kind of, to, to explain what that is um, I'll make it short. Basically in the, I believe it was the late 1700s that might have been the early 1800s—

Back when Toronto was York.

Uh yeah, when it was Upper and Lower Canada, um there was a Scottish gentleman that um, basically came across over to Canada, he was kicked out of Scotland for being gay and he came over with his twinkie boyfriend. And as the legend basically goes, they moved into a like, manor house in Ontario—

On Church St. actually.

Uh, yeah in northern Church St. and it was like, this is a legend—[Nick interrupts and overlaps here, hard to discern the exact words]

The twinkie boyfriend may or may not have been a werewolf.

A werewolf that was killing cops and, and this movie has never been made and I would love to make it, because that needs to be made!

But is, is that—

[An offscreen audience member interrupts and responds, I can’t make out what they said]

[Both Nick and James laugh]

The Scottish told us to stop looking into it. Not us, but there was a, the Toronto Library, the Library of Toronto apparently was doing some research into it and the Welsh and Scottish uh, governments made them stop. Um—

Like why are you hiding werewolves from us, Scotland?

Especially with some circles that this fandom has, there's no, please [can’t discern] like the werewolves. So um, so yeah, there is, there's story-worthy stuff happening in Canada but you don't know about it because that doesn't get circulation, it doesn't get traction, and Americans for some reason just don't find this country interesting. Like what, you don't like politics where all we do is talking? Jesus, like aren't you jealous of our talking politics.

You know, it's, I think I feel like a part of it is our, as a country's fault, that we do have this really interesting, these really interesting pieces of queer history in Canada, um, that we don't brag about. We don't talk about like, every queer American will tell you the story of Stonewall up and down, they'll get it wrong about who threw a brick and everything—

Who was the [unsure] thought that the people died at Stonewall? [Genuinely not sure what question he’s asking here]

Oh God, I can't remember. Um, but like they will know that and even those of us who do know these stories, if we want to tell it, it's very difficult for us to tell it you know besides like, Nick and I making a video essay about it that has you know, limited reach because YouTube just does not like queer stuff.

Malia @catfishingwords

This was/is a noted issue with Youtube, to the point that some Youtubers tried filing a lawsuit in 2019, though it was ultimately dismissed.

https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/10/10/20893258/youtube-lgbtq-censorship-demonetization-nerd-city-algorithm-report

https://www.them.us/story/lawsuit-alleging-youtube-discriminates-against-lgbtq-users-tossed-out

Um, but you know that's kind of something that you know, recently we have discovered oh there's an audience for queer stories with things like Heartstopper, and Red, White & Royal Blue, and things like that, and it's like oh people actually like these things, and will watch them and…then we're sitting on this trove of historical stories that are real life things that were just like [hums and hms jokingly].

And so that becomes the issue, because America, the world's largest media producer, doesn't have much of an interest in Canadian topics, Canadians themselves don't seem to have much awareness about Canadian history, or Canadian topics, or Canadian—

The interesting stuff!

Unless they explicitly dig for it, because the only thing that's taught in Canadian history classes is not the interesting stuff. Um, and we do, we do have that, uh.

Like as a teenager I could tell you like, chapter and verse American history, from like the Mayflower onward and…I might have known who the first Prime Minister was, it's Johnny MacDonald, I know that now, but when I was 16 I might not have known that.

Malia @catfishingwords

This is true. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_A._Macdonald

Uh and so that has a ripple effect to contemporary [??] identity which I find a bit concerning is that we just don't have that attachment um, and even worse where we kind of mistakenly, and I'm very guilty of this, we mistakenly co-opt American rights, and American identity into being part of our own identity, of our own personal identities, um when that just isn't the case. Like we have a very different culture of queerness uh, from America. Uh, well maybe not very different, but like—

I think—

In terms of our rights progressions, where we are right now, what rights we have available to us, we we don't have as much, I'm saying we in the larger sense—

There's a, there's a focus. Like Canadians will we kind of hyper focus on queer rights in America, because again we think oh you know we won, it's over, um, and we're not paying attention to the fact that New Brunswick just recently passed some anti-queer laws and put them into effect that are gonna affect a lot of people in school.

Malia @catfishingwords

He is referring to changes to Policy 713, a set of standards for how New Brunswick schools should treat LGBTQ+ students. Specifically, there’s a lot of controversy around not mandating teachers to use a student’s preferred name and pronouns if the student is under 16 as well as pushing for (though not necessarily requiring) parental consent to do so formally.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/policy-713-explainer-1.6890043

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick-trans-lgbtq-higgs-1.6889957

And most of us don't know this is happening, we know stuff's going on in Florida and Texas and everything, but again that's that media permanent, permanence that just comes into Canada, and we know what's going on in Florida and we know, you know, that all of that stuff with the presidential election we know there's crazy stuff that's going on there, but we don't know that oh it's actually happening here to a lesser degree very quietly, and we're just completely out of the loop on it—

Yeah and because—

They feel like, they feel safe that they're out of, that they're keeping us out of the loop.

Yeah and so like, we get to the situation where we throw all of our thoughts and prayers in America, because you know, God knows they need it, but like we, we would, we should also probably reserve a handful of thoughts and prayers for ourselves because we've got a lot going on here too. Um, and it might not be as severe as America but you know that doesn't mean there isn't stuff to work on here. Um, that's why my notes keep disappearing, um, and so like on the other hand—

This was much more like, detailed, planned out before we started talking. Usually what happens—

Well that's why we over detail and overplan everything, because we know it's going to fall apart.

[Both laugh]

Um…uh, so like we get into a situation where we mistake American identity for Canadian identity, um, and that means we get distracted from you know, Canadian fights, but it also means we have this weird fixation on American victories.

Yeah.

Um, where we celebrate American, we celebrate American rights in a way that we, we don't, I don't, I don't think we celebrate Canadian victories.

Yeah like there were parties like, I remember when the Supreme Court said that you know, you could have same-sex marriage in the United States, there were parties in Canada in Toronto and Vancouver and Montreal, just like there were in the United States. But when we did that I don't remember giant parties happening.

There was uh, granted I was I was a youngin’ at the time, um and there was interest, but it wasn't something uh, Canadian marriage wasn't something we really kind of, you know, we promoted it as a sense of we have something America doesn't, but it wasn't something that was—

We’re very proud of that.

[indiscernible] I found that—

[Both laugh]

Um…uh, and, and started that slew of weird American movies where gay couples went to America [not sure if he accidentally said “America” instead of Canada, or I can’t hear him well] could get married.

That happened a lot.

That was like a, that was uh an era of like movies and television where that kind of happened.

Yeah like, well that, that happened. The first time I remember that happening was on the TV show Queer as Folk um, which was actually a Canadian co-production that never gets any credit for being a Canadian co-production.

About the American remake of Queer as Folk, he is correct about it being a Canadian co-production.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_as_Folk_(American_TV_series)

I forget that every time you mention it. Point in case, everyone.

And I think it was in season four they went to Canada on a, on a charity bike ride, and uh Michael and Ben got married, and it was this, this whole you know storyline about how safe it was in Canada and stuff like that, versus the United States and everything. And like, that was the image of Canada that queer Americans were being given, that it's like, you know, Canada is this, like, this, which, yeah.

Malia @catfishingwords

This episode exists.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0681355/

Which like, that's what, that's what I said with American media dominance, and how that kind of gets outsourced into Canada, the messaging that we get from uh, Americans is that kind of this you know utopic place of queer rights, and that you know like, because by comparison I guess, and so we kind of internalize it, I think, to an extent—

Yeah!

Where we don't really have interests in our rights, or histories, or kind of progress that needs to be made, like with the New Brunswick laws uh, pushing for banning conversion therapy. Things like that kind of get swept into the rug, because the messaging we get from American media is that we don't need to fix anything, because we're already doing you know, aces.

Malia @catfishingwords

Just a side note: Canada passed a bill banning conversion therapy in late 2021, taking effect in 2022.

https://www.npr.org/2021/12/09/1062720266/canada-bans-conversion-therapy

https://egale.ca/egale-in-action/conversion-therapy-ban-canada/

https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/charter-charte/c4_1.html

Yeah we do, we do get that a lot that like, “Oh everything's great in Canada like, you guys got gay marriage in like 2006,” I think? Um—

Malia @catfishingwords

Again, pretty close, 2005.

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/same-sex-marriage-in-canada

It's the same thing as healthcare really, like, just because we have healthcare and they don't doesn't mean we don't need to fix the trash fire that is our current healthcare system.

Yeah, and you know, there were so many Americans I remember like being online, chronically online in like 2006, 2007, and having a lot of American friends, and then kind of kind of saying like, “You guys got gay marriage, like everything's good now,” and I'm like, I have a lot of disabled friends who are queer, that would disagree with you, because if they get gay married, they're going to lose benefits, and that's something we still haven't dealt with—

Malia @catfishingwords

This is true.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/household-income-policy-stops-couple-from-living-together-1.6105746

https://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/comment-stop-making-disabled-canadians-choose-between-love-and-survival-4691948

Well honesty, I—

And that we don't like to talk about it.

I’d rather have a job and be openly gay than get married, between the two. Uh, when it comes to marriage, and Americans have this weird fixation, or queer Americans have this weird fixation around marriage um, to the point of like, attacking us, like online for, regularly, for, and aggressively. Like some, like you know, questioning my safety, but like, a little bit shell-shocked for talking about it.

Malia @catfishingwords

I have no idea if this is the case, and Nick is a different person, but given James’s previous weaponization of alluded-to online harassment in order to drum up sympathy and stop criticism of his behavior, I would take this statement with a large grain of salt, even if Nick is somewhat joking.

But um, it's this kind of idea that marriage was and is the be-all end-all of everything, and here in Canada there's very little rights-wise that you can get from marriage that you can't just get from being common law.

Malia @catfishingwords

Legally, marriage is a federal status which grants participants the same legal rights no matter what region of Canada they live in, while common-law is a provincial status, and thus what rights and privileges participants have can vary depending on provincial law. There are advantages and disadvantages to choosing either.

https://globalnews.ca/news/6532711/common-law-vs-marriage/

https://www.mlawgroup.ca/difference-between-common-law-and-marriage/

https://www.mlawgroup.ca/difference-between-common-law-and-marriage/

Yeah um, I assume, I've never been either so [laughter].

Well again, in America like, and apparently it's also just the structure of how America works uh, I guess that too, but the structure of how marriage works in America, because you were telling me that there's a bunch of things that you can do as a married person that you can't do as a single person in America.

Malia @catfishingwords

In 2010, before same-sex marriage was legalized, Obama issued a memorandum requesting that the Department of Health and Human Services create more equitable and non-discriminatory rules for hospitals that participated in Medicare or Medicaid. In 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released their rules which required eligible hospitals to provide patients the right to choose who may visit them, have written visitation policies, and grant equal rights for all allowed visitors

Despite these rules, some hospitals still discriminated against unmarried partners of patients. And obviously, if a hospital was 100% private and did not participate in Medicaid or Medicare, these rules did not apply.

Of course, the federal legalization of same-sex marriage in the US in 2015 doesn’t mean there are now no more unfair barriers for unmarried partners or other parties involved in caring for a patient that aren’t reliant on the legal contract of marriage or other legally recognized forms of dependence/intimacy/family. However, the disproportionate impact on LGBTQ+ people at the time is pretty obvious, I think, and while I agree with Nick on the principle, I don’t fault certain groups’ activism for focusing on the more materially simpler bridge of same-sex marriage rights.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2010/11/17/new-rules-require-equal-visitation-rights-all-patients

https://www.nclrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/FAQ-New-Fed-Hospital-Visitation-Rules.pdf

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/hospital-visitation-and-medical-decision-making-for-same-sex-couples/

https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=lawreview

Well there's you know, tax breaks and stuff like that that you get when you're married, and in a lot of states, if you're not married they won't let you into hospitals and stuff like that, which—

Which like, that seems—

Those are maybe rights that are worth fighting for.

Those, those also seem to me like, you know, hospital admission rights seems like an entirely separate issue that marriage should not be involved in.

Employment non-discrimination—

Malia @catfishingwords

Is James implying that no one has been working on non-discrimination activism in the US? What? There have been many public fights over this very issue for decades, including many federal SCOTUS cases and federal bills that have been introduced but never fully passed, both before and after same-sex marriage became legalized.

https://www.nypl.org/blog/2020/06/18/supreme-court-ruling-lgbtq-employment-rights

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_employment_discrimination_in_the_United_States

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/beyond-bostock-future-lgbtq-civil-rights/

Yeah.

Should have been on the dock at first.

Yeah and so like, all of the things that I, when I hear Americans talk about why marriage was so important, all of the things that marriage gave them I think are things that they should have had regardless of being married or not.

And to just prove the point we've spent the last five minutes talking about America, and because American media, American news just finds its way in, it's like a brain worm that just goes in and just kind of sticks in there.

Again, upwards of ten times the population.

Yeah, and like, like you said like, that doesn't so much happen with, with, what was it? The Netherlands?

It was the Netherlands and Germany specifically. And granted, that I've never been to either place, but so, but I'm just kind of playing a numbers game. But again uh, it's also a shared language uh, which is why most of the Canadian year that gets out there is French, because you know that doesn't really have any American competition.

Yeah, I know way more Americans who know what uh, Bon Cop, Bad Cop is.

Malia @catfishingwords

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bon_Cop,_Bad_Cop#

[Offscreen audience response, I think “It’s one of the greatest movies I’ve ever seen”?] [James and Nick laugh]

I haven't seen it yet, actually.

[Offscreen audience response, unsure of what is said]

[not sure what he says here] relatively bad one, we’ve been talking about America for about half an hour so far.

So it's like, I know way more Americans who know what that is and like, we covered that in film school and everything, than Americans who might know, you know, damn, now I can't even think of a Canadian movie.

And like if an English Canadian movie gets to the point of getting Oscar buzz, oh God, that's everywhere.

When did that happen?

I remember there was one about hockey a few years ago.

That got Oscar buzz?

I don't know it was just getting a lot

[Offscreen audience responds, I can make out some words and I think they’re saying approximately (not exact phrasing) “Movies that get Oscar buzz not from Quebec are usually from Maritime”?]

Yeah like um, oh, I can see the movie poster.

[Offscreen audience member responds, can’t make out what they say]

That’s it! Yes!

Malia @catfishingwords

I don’t know what movie(s) they are referring to in this exchange.

That one, um the video store I grew up near had that poster up for like a decade. Um, stuff like that and—

I was actually working for uh Halifax Pride uh, when Elliot Page was going around doing uh her, his documentary. Um…sorry, it was at the time, and uh. there was a. everyone came into the office like “Oh my God have you heard? He's just outside.” It was uh, the office was a buzz.

Malia @catfishingwords

I think he’s referring to this documentary? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There%27s_Something_in_the_Water

And that was, that was actually, I remember when Juno first came out, like every Canadian being like, “Oh, this is a Canadian movie, look at all the Americans watching the Canadian movie” and that was a movie the Canadian government refused to fund, even though it had a Canadian, mostly Canadian cast, Canadian director, Canadian producers, they had to go to America, getting America to get the money, and then it made a couple hundred million dollars and won some Oscars.

Malia @catfishingwords

There was a bit of controversy at the time of awards season that Juno wasn’t deemed Canadian enough for the Genies because of its American funding (though apparently it was just never submitted for the Genies). It did still win two Canadian Comedy awards.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/genies-deem-juno-not-canadian-105956/

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/canadian-comedy-awards-fetes-jason-120364/

Also Juno did make 232 million dollars at the box office.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230607000909/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl2539488769/

I can’t find anything about people requesting Canadian government funding for Juno, only that many American studios thought the premise was too controversial and risky to make. Ultimately, it was produced by two American companies, Mr. Mudd and Mandate Pictures.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080528103051/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20007870_20164475_20175163_3,00.html

In general, this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me because the origins of Juno are that Diablo Cody, an American writer, wrote the screenplay at the urging of an American talent agent as a sample script, and then that script was sent along to Jason Reitman. This doesn’t make the possibility of requesting Canadian financial assistance completely impossible, just not as intuitive as Somerton makes it sound.

https://web.archive.org/web/20071108211100/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20155516_20155530_20157948,00.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20151018024354/https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/features/39765-jason-reitman-tackles-teen-pregnancy-in-juno

And it's like, that cycle keeps repeating itself, that there are these movies that we would be able to take credit for that the government, the federal government um, no matter what party's in charge, for some reason they're always like “No, it's not Canadian enough. No, we don't want to say that Titanic is a Canadian movie, or Avatar, or Juno, or Aliens, we don't want to say that these are Canadian movies, or Arrival”—

Malia @catfishingwords

I don’t know why Canada is being brought up regarding Aliens. Obviously James Cameron wrote and directed it, but besides that it stayed with the same American production and distribution companies that Alien had. Also Aliens was filmed mostly in England.

Maybe there’s secret missing context/info I’m missing here, but I don’t know why the Canadian government would’ve been involved at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliens_(film)#Filming

https://web.archive.org/web/20200901095929/https://www.ign.com/articles/the-making-of-aliens-titan-rinzler-james-cameron-gale-anne-hurd

A discussion about a bureaucratic board of politicians deciding what is—

Malia @catfishingwords

I think they are talking about the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), which does state that one of their goals is to “ensure that Canadian broadcasting content meets the needs and interests of Canadians by delivering compelling, high-quality Canadian-made creative content from diverse sources on a variety of platforms.” The policies and system they’ve developed are called “CanCon” colloquially.

https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/cancon.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content

There is also a bill recently passed in 2023 called Bill C-11 (or the Online Streaming Act) that is intended to regulate digital and social media platforms (this including streaming platforms) similarly to how the CRTC already regulates TV and radio broadcast in Canada. The stated goal is to get these platforms to support and promote Canadian content (as it qualifies under CanCon) to Canadian users. This is a fairly controversial bill. The exact details and logistics have yet to be announced.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/bill-c-11-explained-1.6759878

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65420133

https://betakit.com/as-bill-c-11-passes-youtube-influencers-content-creators-express-concern-while-big-tech-quiet/

There is a separate bill, the Online News Act, that was also passed in 2023 that intended to make social media companies compensate domestic Canadian news publishers for reposting/aggregating their news content (targeted at Google and Facebook/Meta). This has resulted in these companies, particularly Facebook/Meta blocking direct access to Canadian news on their platforms.

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/online-news.html

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canada-keep-pressure-facebook-pay-news-trudeau-says-2023-12-15/

https://web.archive.org/web/20231203025008/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/23/business/media/meta-google-canada-news-facebook-instagram.html

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/some-canadian-news-outlets-already-seeing-content-blocked-on-instagram/article_3ebdec2c-90ac-5c29-9fa5-c6f4952c4228.html

Note: I’m not Canadian nor a Canadian content creator, and this is not my wheelhouse so I may have missed something. This is more my best guess of what they’re referring to than a definite assertion.

Well they're not politicians, they're not elected.

[Offscreen audiences responds, can’t discern what they’re saying, interspersed with James saying “Yeah” in response, and Nick and James laughing]

Um…Yeah, and I don't like that group of people because like, that's a board, there's no personal accountability for that because if one person is held accountable, they're replaced, but the board itself does not change, but policies do not change.

And I mean they're even currently trying to put into effect things that will make it harder for Canadians to see Canadian content on YouTube, because their their thought process behind it with these bills, these Canadian Heritage bills that they've recently passed, that are trying to basically bring online media, give parity between online media and television um, is that you know they want more Canadian content to be put in front of Canadian eyeballs is their thought process, but what is actually happening is they're like, “Okay, if you don't, okay, Facebook, YouTube, if you don't do this we're gonna fine you,” and so YouTube and Facebook are like, “Okay, well we're just gonna not show any Canadian stuff at all to Canadians,” and I've seen it like on my computer that like I've clicked on a CTV News video and it's like “This is blocked in your region,” I'm like “What?”

Yeah.

But not in America.

And so it's this board of, you know, largely anonymous board of people who are deciding what isn't is not Canadian content, and we don't know—

They're not anonymous but they're, most people don't know who they are.

Malia @catfishingwords

Yeah. https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/acrtc/organ.htm

Well, I mean like, you know, like, it's uh, the policies, I'm more spiritual, you know, spiritually anonymous, um and so, it's this group of people and they're deciding what is and isn't Canadian enough, rather than me looking at the Reboot television series that's made in Canada, that was made by Canadians, therefore it is Canadian, and showcase um, you know, excellence Canadian digital animation in a period of time when George Lucas couldn't get his Pixar off the ground because they didn't think there was any money in there.

Malia @catfishingwords

ReBoot was produced in Canada by Canadian animation studios and production companies, though I will note that its creators were all British people who moved to Vancouver for production because the costs were cheaper.

It’s stated that production of ReBoot began in 1991, though I can’t find an exact, reliable citation for that. It did begin airing on YTV in 1994.

https://retrofiedmag.com/the-oral-history-of-reboot-tvs-cgi-pioneer/

https://computeranimationhistory-cgi.jimdofree.com/reboot-1994/

I’m not totally sure what Nick is referring to here re: Pixar, as it began as the “Computer Division” of Lucasfilm in 1979 and then Steve Jobs financed and spun it out as a separate company from Lucasfilms in 1986, because Lucas needed money for a divorce settlement. It was after this separation that the company became Pixar. For several years, the company had significant financial struggles (despite industry and critical acclaim for its graphics software and short films in the 1980s) until the release of Toy Story in 1995 in collaboration with Disney.

This is to say, Lucas was not the person who conceptualized Pixar as an artistic digital animation studio/production company. Pixar as Pixar did not exist while he was in charge. His financial struggles at the time were also not because so few people believed in the profitability of digital animation. The story of how Pixar entered digital animation as a studio is incremental and complex, and does include its time as a part of Lucasfilms, but I think Nick’s framing of Pixar’s origins is incorrect.

https://www.theringer.com/movies/2022/6/13/23165618/pixar-ipo-business-rise-history-george-lucas-steve-jobs

https://variety.com/2006/digital/features/lucas-left-pixar-party-early-disney-came-late-1117939698/

https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-real-story-of-pixar

https://www.pixar.com/our-story-pixar

https://www.bloopanimation.com/pixar-animation-studios-the-story-behind-the-studio/

And so we're in a situation where a sense of Canadianness is a set of quantifiable elements about, you know, checklists and representations, rather—

Malia @catfishingwords

They’re joking obviously, but the implication is that the CanCon guidelines are content-driven in an abstract, nationalist sense, when they’re more about the production team and financing being Canadian-based.

This is not to imply that there aren’t issues with this points-based rubric or that there aren’t disagreements about its executions, but more that it’s not inherently about the content of a piece of media itself.

https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/cancon/c_cdn.htm

https://crtc.gc.ca/canrec/eng/guide1.htm

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/streamers-required-to-feature-cancon-1.6415661

https://cmf-fmc.ca/now-next/articles/cancondef-the-current-definition-of-canadian-content-explained-part-one/

https://hughstephensblog.net/2022/06/16/unravelling-the-complexities-of-the-canadian-content-cancon-conundrum/

https://nationalpost.com/news/extremely-canadian-media-that-ottawa-doesnt-consider-cancon

The right amount of beavers.

[chuckles] Rather than as the checklist goes, [James interrupts with another quip, not sure what he or Nick say]. I was shocked to learn um, very shocked to learn that the checklist is real, it wasn't just a joke, um and it is exactly what you think it is, um only with more things, and so rather than just—

You do have options there's maple leafs, beavers—

You can go maple leafs or beavers—

Parliament, you can show Parliament.

And so like, once again, like a sense of Canada which is, is about a current contemporary idea of what—

It's much more, in the, you know, the dangerous word, it's much more driven toward Canadian propaganda, than it is Canadian media. The federal government would much prefer, you know, which, nobody wants to see propaganda in general, let alone people from another country. And so it seems like, you know, the heritage ministers and stuff like that are more interested in that, than they are in actually promoting—

Oh yeah.

Canadian people.They want to promote the idea of—

Canadian excellence is Canadian content, like that's what I think, because like —

And Canadian excellence are movies like Arrival, and like, things that Denis Villeneuve has done, and James Cameron, and like…these amazing actors that leave Canada, because they can't work.

These actors, creators, they, they got their education in Canada, they got their cultural sensibilities in Canada, um they got their drive in Canada, and those are things that the Canadian people should be able to take credit for as saying, “I belong to a nation that generated this stuff.”

Mmhm.

But the Canadian government uh, or at least the kind of, certain bodies of the government seem to be preventing people from having that sense of pride and being Canadian—

Yeah.

In lieu of wanting this kind of uh, a hodgepodge-y kind of—

Something that's more easily taken credit for.

Yeah, you can take, a political body can take credit for a piece of work. if there is a political symbol in it.

Mmhmm, yeah.

And so um, and that's also why uh, Canadian authors, Canadian writers usually end up leaving—

Well Margaret Atwood's an example of, she just left, she tried being published, you know, the writer of The Handmaid's Tale and multiple like, classic novels, tried being published in Canada, was turned down because their books weren't Canadian enough—

Malia @catfishingwords

This is not true. You can check out the publishing companies of her earlier books on Wikipedia, but even The Handmaid’s Tale was first published by a Canadian publisher, McClelland & Stewart. She was in general, very popular as a Canadian author and literary figure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Atwood#Works

https://fisherdigitus.library.utoronto.ca/exhibits/show/strength-in-numbers/case-8-handmaids-tale

Yeah.

And then left, and became one of the most, you know, published through New York, and became one of the most celebrated authors of the generation.

Did you know one of my favorite books is Canadian?

No.

It was written in the 1800s, called A Strange Manuscript Found on a Copper Cylinder, or A Strange Manuscript Found in a Strange—

Malia @catfishingwords

This is a little complicated, but basically early colonies of Canada were united and granted self-governance in 1867, but as a British dominion. Canada did not receive full independence from the UK until 1982.

https://www.britannica.com/place/Canada

https://www.history.com/news/canada-independence-from-britain-france-war-of-1812

The author of A Strange Manuscript Found on a Copper Cylinder, James De Mille, is generally considered a Canadian writer.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-De-Mille

Technically, Canada wasn’t a country in the 1800s, I don't know if you'd say—

Sorry about that, um…it's very much about, uh…what's the word? [mumbling]?

I have no idea.

It’s the political version of colonial—imperialism, very anti-imperialist. Um, it was rediscovered a little bit in the postmodern area, uh era, and I think it was Arthur Miller, he shared a name with a famous philosopher, and I think that's the one.

Malia @catfishingwords

James De Mille. The philosopher he’s referring to, I think is John Stuart Mill? I’m not sure. And Arthur Miller (at least, probably the one being mixed up in this case) is an American writer.

It does seem the postmodern criticism is significantly responsible for the novel’s resurgence.

https://canlitguides.ca/canlit-guides-editorial-team/a-strange-manuscript-found-in-a-copper-cylinder-by-james-de-mille/

Um, it's been on my bookshelf for ages, and I just haven't cracked it open again. Uh, and so like, where is our kind of, presence of historic literature either? Uh, our presence of historic media? And in a desperate bid to kind of, craft a sense of uh, political, and national, and social pride in this country uh, we're just missing out on having any of that content.

Yeah and like, for instance, this was something that, Nick wrote a novel called Gentlemen's Club and it takes place in San Francisco, and we were going through the list of the Canadian book awards that Canadian authors can submit to, and it was disqualified from all of them, because it doesn't take place in Canada and so even though it's a Canadian author, you know, that is, and it's about you know, queer superheroes, and—

Malia @catfishingwords

I don’t want to completely dismiss that Nick’s novel was disqualified from Canadian literary awards due to this, but I had a hard time finding any Canadian awards that specifically disqualify books for being set outside of Canada. Most of the disqualifying elements that would apply to Nick’s novel, Gentleman’s Club, are attributes such as it being a full-length YA novel, it being his only published work, being self-published, Nick (likely) not being from an award’s respective regional focus (British Columbia, Quebec, etc.), and other factors.

The main award I found that the book could’ve been potentially eligible for and doesn’t rule out non-Canadian-set stories was the Amazon Canada First Novel Award, but I genuinely may have missed something. And I did not check every winner and nominee for that one, but I did find that while the vast majority of them are set in Canada, it’s not exclusively so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_literature#Awards

https://canadianauthors.org/national/competitions/

https://www.ntherrgott.com/avalonknightseries

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/gentlemans-club-nt-herrgott/1138450789

https://www.writersdigest.com/writers-digest-competitions

And I have never not lived in America, or never not lived in, never not lived in Canada.

Yeah, and so, even though it's like it is Canadian excellence, it is disqualified from being an example of Canadian excellence, because well, it takes place in San Francisco, instead of—

Ergo, it can't be Canadian. Again, how do you define Canadian? Like, and we're supposed to be talking about gay rights in Canada.

We are supposed to, yeah.

Again, funny how this happens.

[Both laugh]

And like, I think that kind of makes the point is that we as queer Canadians don't, for the most part, have a real idea of what a queer Canadian identity or is and—

Or, I think it should rather be said, it's more difficult to garnish that through osmosis, the way it's much more easy—

Well, yeah, I was going to say, because, you know, it's not that the information isn't there, the books are available in the libraries and stuff, like that. You can read them. I, I've read several the last couple of years, um, but the media that people watch the most, TV shows, movies, that's not there to, kind of, say, like, there is a queer Canadian history that you don't know exists.

Well, kinda, like, most people have their sense of Canadian history not from Canadian movie or Canadian contents, Canadian movie and Canadian content, but from those like, little mini like, five-minute historical—

[Offscreen audience member chimes in]

Heritage minutes! There we go! Uh, we, we get it from those, uh—

The basketball commercial.

Malia @catfishingwords

https://youtu.be/xiJJIacdF-E?si=yIFL0hFbfXFBCdcI

[Both Nick and James laugh]

Yeah, we uh, instead of having um, miniseries, or major TV movies, or even full movies uh, and maybe we do have those, but they don't get promoted either next to American media, we just there isn't that much sense of the government wanting to push that along, and push that out, and specifically push that outside of Canada.

Yeah, and the thing that, like, it doesn't confuse me, because I know why it doesn't happen, um, is you will see things that are co-produced by the BBC and HBO, and they're very British, they are the most British things you will ever see, and they're promoted by HBO or Netflix. Why isn't CBC trying to do that? Netflix Canada is a thing.

Take something like a Letterkenny, which is popular in Canada, not my style, but I appreciate it, and it doesn't have much traction outside of Canada, even though it has a very similar cultural sensibility to that kind of dry Adult Swim-type humor that you get from a lot of American-like indie co—indie comedy stuff uh, but it so, by just a numbers game, it really should be more popular than it is across the border but because it's not because it's explicitly Canadian, it doesn't seem to have that kind of grab.

Malia @catfishingwords

I have no way to verify this claim. I’ll just call it as true enough since it’s kind of subjective and I don’t know anything significant about the marketing, distribution, or viewer ratings/data of Letterkenny. It’s currently on Hulu, but I know that wasn’t always the case, and previously it was hard to legally watch if you were outside of Canada for some time.

Yeah, and again, that comes back to Schitt’s Creek which was, you know, Canadian across the board: it was filmed in Canada, it started Canadians, all of that, but they never said it was in Canada.

Malia @catfishingwords

Addressed previously.

I have this question of like, a chicken in the egg sort of thing like, is Canadian media poorly received in America because there isn't an established pattern of, you know, expecting good stuff to come out of Canada, or is it just Americans have no interest?

Mmhmm.

Because we can talk about like, developmental producers and stuff, and like, they may say look at Canadian content and say like, “Oh there's just no, no call, not much call for that here.” Um, but time and time again, it's kind of proven correct that executives generally follow trends, and they don't really know why things work the way that they do. Um, so is it just because there hasn't really been a good attempt of promoting a Canadian story or Canadian content outside of Canada, because the stuff that's made here can't compete, uh, financially like in terms of budget and quality with stuff that's produced in America, um—

Malia @catfishingwords

I’m not exactly sure what qualifies for here, but looking up the executive producers of Schitt’s Creek (two of which were also main actors on the show), a little over half of them did sign deals for new projects after the show ended (Eugene Levy, Dave Levy, David West Read, and Andrew Barnsley).

Of the other three (Fred Levy, Ben Feigin, and Kevin White), Fred has only produced Schitt’s Creek, White has been an EP for other Canadian TV shows (Kim’s Convenience, Strays) but didn’t pop up in any particularly new reports, and Feigin passed away in 2022.

So it’s a mixed bag? I would say it’s not true to say they haven’t gotten any Hollywood deals though.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/schitts-creek-dan-levy-netflix-film-tv-deal-1235014909/

https://deadline.com/2021/11/eugene-levy-to-host-travel-series-for-apple-1234865518/

https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/matthew-mcconaughey-woody-harrelson-apple-tv-comedy-true-detective-1235554047/

https://www.tvinsider.com/1007607/schitts-creek-producer-new-comedy-son-of-a-critch/

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6292838/

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0925074/

Like it's very telling, I think um, that you know the producers of Schitt’s Creek, after it was a huge success in Canada, in the US, across the world on Netflix, they never got a production deal in the US. It's like, well, why not? Why was there no Hollywood production deal? Why was there no follow-up production deal with CBC, or anything?

Well, what my question is is if, why would they have to go to Hollywood for that, if the kids, we have a national, as a nation we have this story that is wildly popular around the world, huge following, why is the administration, the powers that be, whoever not just saying like “Let's change the rules for this, maybe other things, because we see a venue for more Canadian excellence”?

Malia @catfishingwords

I’m not sure what exactly he’s getting at here? I’m not sure what rules he’s referring to? Schitt’s Creek was sold to CBC?

https://web.archive.org/web/20190529140541/https://www.vulture.com/2019/01/schitts-creek-netflix-pop-success-story.html

And there was a hot minute right after um, Schitt’s Creek won like every Emmy for its final season that um, the federal Liberals were talking about changing the Heritage laws, the Heritage Act, so that more generally produced content could be funded in Canada, and then the pandemic happened and that just went away, um.

Malia @catfishingwords

The Emmys ceremony when Schitt’s Creek won would’ve been in September, 2020 and I couldn’t find specific news on this within a 2018-2021 timeframe, besides the previously mentioned bills that regulate online platforms. But I very well could’ve missed something more local or casual.

Also Telos is gone because it was revealed to be kind of a scam.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/12/popular-gay-youtuber-deletes-online-presence-after-video-accuses-him-of-rampant-plagiarism/

https://theacecouple.com/episode116/

Maybe someday we'll get a reprise of, that kind of attempt to relook the law.

Maybe someday. Um, but, you know, until then, that is one thing that, you know, little self-promotion, Telos, our production company, is actually making, we're going into production in, in 2024, of a movie that is, again, doesn't take place in a Canadian city, but it is starring Canadians, it's written and produced by Canadians, directed by Canadians, and takes place in Canada, but there's not going to be any maple leafs flying around or anything like that, but it is Canadian media, queer Canadian media that will be put out there, and you know, just to test the waters and see if there there is an audience for that, because I think there is.

I, I think the digital age and the democratization of media that has come through the ability to self-promote and self-create things, like with Vivziepop, um, and a lot of other independent creators is learning that there is a large audience for a lot of stuff that has been formerly had its nose turned up. Um, so I think that there is probably a sizable market for a lot of the stuff that we're talking about should exist, just because like if, and this is kind of why what my philosophy with writing like, there's always a question like “Oh my god what if no one cares about what I'm writing about?” Um, if you care about it, you're not so independent and unique that nobody else is going to care about it also. There's going to be someone a lot of people out there who have the same wants and then desires as you do.

Yeah.

Um…

As we've kind of proven there's 320,000 subscribers on the YouTube channel who actually care about what two Canadians think.

I still don't know how we got garnished that.

I don't know why.

I'm just making little videos about Disney.

[Both laugh]

Oh God, the early days, uh…

But yeah, so I think like, in closing, just kind of saying, you know, I, I think that there is, that there is a distinct queer Canadian identity that is distinct from the American identity.

Well, I don't think that identity exists without media to reflect that identity either—

I think, well, I think it does exist, we just don't reflect it back at ourselves.

Well yeah, like, you don’t get that sense of a feedback loop that reinforces that, so we're constantly trying to find ways to kind of, separate ourselves, and distinguish ourselves from, from Americans, as being different than Americans, rather than kind of focusing on what is Canadian.

Yeah. And that's not necessarily how many beavers you can fit into ninety minutes.

Pixar just makes its next movie about beavers.

Well, Turning Red took place in Canada.

Malia @catfishingwords

Yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_Red

It did actually, yeah. Point in case, why have we not talked about that for this discussion yet?

[Both laugh]

Yeah, exactly!

Instead of New York looking like Toronto, um…so I, but I do want to kind of, before we go into uh…

Question time?

That's the word! Question time! Sort of reiterating the points, that you know, like we're not Americas, Americans, we have different a different collection of laws, rights, protections, and different identities, and it's important to not get so enwrapped with American, uh, politics and American identity that we lose track of where we are at now. Like, at the same time, same hand, we can't compare ourselves against American victories, we can't compare ourselves against American failures, but at the same time, we can't put Canada on a pedestal.

Yeah.

Like we still got our own work to do and we're not America, so we need to focus on what we need to do rather than how we have it good compared to America or…

Yeah, because Canadians, as Canadians, as a country we do have a whole lot of work left to do, and looking at America via American media and saying “Well, we've got a good compared to them”—

That's how we make no progress, or regress.

Regress, yeah, the, yeah that's the direction. Okay so, um, yeah, so I guess that's that. Uh, we rambled a lot. I thought it would—no, I'm not shocked at all. Uh, so does anybody have any questions? Yeah.

[Audience member speaks at length, can’t decipher what they say]

Um, just summarize the question before we answer it. Uh, so the question as far as I understand was, you want to know, is there any way we can kind of, uh, radio is a space for Canadians to kind of flourish, and is there any way that we can kind of, propagate that in a similar way with other media?

[Audience member speaks more, can’t understand]

Yeah, like I the only time that I'm like “Oh, this is Canadian,” is when I can tell it's been produced following the heritage laws because it's got all the specific things. Um, but I think with something like music, it's, there's a much lower barrier to entry, so to, you know, produce a record costs, you know, a percentage of what it would cost to make a movie or a TV show—

Malia @catfishingwords

CanCon rules on music: https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/INFO_SHT/R1.htm

I can’t weigh in on song production costs vs. film/TV production costs. Both can highly vary depending on the intended output, but James’s statement isn’t incorrect by any means.

Not to mention that, but radio is very localized like when it comes to FM and AM stations like you get a, a much narrower um, scope of how this, uh, how those signals kind of travel, as opposed to film distribution across the world which is y’know, trucks and, I guess now, email, um…

Yeah, uh, mostly hard drives. Um, whereas…sorry, my brain just went blank there.

[chuckle]

Um, yeah, so it is a much lower barrier to entry for music, and I think that there's kind of a democratization going on now with, you know, like, TikTok, and with YouTube, and stuff like that where you don't need half a million dollars to make something and send it out there, and you can kind of do what we kind of did, which was just be Canadian, and have Canadian perspectives on things, and kind of trick people into paying attention to you, and—

That's really YouTube isn't it? Just tricking people into paying attention to you.

Pretty much. And like, across social media like, there's a lot of, and on YouTube, there's a lot of Canadian YouTubers, and a lot of queer Canadian YouTubers that nobody knows that they're Canadian.

I really like it when Americans learn about the house hippo.

[Both laugh, offscreen audience comments but is indiscernible]

Malia @catfishingwords

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_hippo

It’s always, it's always great when you show them the house hippo for the first time, when you're, and they're like “What is this?”

I just watched a compilation of that, of people reacting to that commercial—

And oh, the, the one with the robot arm! The arm comes off!

Yeah, yeah.

The arm comes off, yeah.

“I can put my arm back on, you can’t.”

Malia @catfishingwords

It’s an old safety PSA.

https://youtu.be/Km4f-eRE4Kc?si=yb3MrCDsJ8e15Yi1

I just watched a compilation of Americans reacting to that, to the house hippo commercial and so many of them thinking, Nick interrupts with “Is that actually”] “Does Canada have pygmy hippos?”

[Both laugh]

Like y’know, just point missed.

[Audience laughs]

Yeah, completely missed

Um, one thing I really like is learning when I artists like follow, I follow a lot of illustrators, um, perfectly safe for work, wholesome artists, um, and then learning that they're actually Canadian, like, “Oh my God same.”

I think that answered the question, I think?

[Offscreen audience member asks question, I can’t hear it well enough to transcribe]

Okay so, to just summarize that, uh, it was a first a statement kind of questioning, uh, the ways that white queer, uh, what the white, specifically gay male identity dominates a lot of the mediascape and stays around, whereas other identities, and especially, I, I want to kind of elaborate that, other people of color are also kind of ignored, and kind of pushed away, like um…well, I’ll get to that later. And then the second one was a question about…[muttering] what was the question?

[Offscreen audience responds, Nick and James laugh]

Right, right! Recognizing um, elder queers as specifically a younger, um—

[Offscreen audience member responds, something about wanting something represented to the audience member as a young person? I don’t know.]

Yeah, um. Uh, to answer the first one, we've actually got some videos planned coming up in the fall and the early winter, um, because I've been noticing that too. Um—

And that’s something I’ve—

Kind of, with my kind of business school/media hat, I know why it's happening and I feel like I need to make a video explaining why it's happening, so people can kind of, change, and hopefully change their trajectory on stuff, um.

And that's something I actually feel fairly cynically about, is like kind of why the gay male has dominated so absolutarianly of a media landscape. Um, but then again—

Like specifically because if you ask—

I, I feel—

If you ask gay men on Twitter what they think of Heartstopper, they will usually say they don't watch it, so there's a [both laugh].

[Multiple audience member responds, something about “straight women,” “boys love,” “Heartstopper”? I’m unsure.]

I actually have heard that recently too, lesbians who kind of hoard their, like, fanfic, like gay, um, gay male, gay boy stories. Um, I, I haven't dug that deep into it, but as for me, I just, like I also find everyone outside of the gay male identity is like, almost caricatured, or stereotyped, like, you get asexual or non-binary people who are basically, essentially robots.

Yeah.

Um, and I, I find that when it's in the identity outside of just uh, the main one, not the main one, the one that everyone seems to care about, oh that's also equally as bad, um, it is very caricatured, and I think that that's a problem because it makes it very difficult for people like those to exist in real life without coming under, without challenging expectations, which is exhausting.

And as for your second question, um, at least for me, I grew up in a really small town, and so it was this really weird kind of thing, where I kind of didn't know that gay people existed, but I knew I liked boys, and there wasn't like, the realization of it until, I can't remember what, I think it was the movie, Kiss Me Guido, my mom rented it, and I was, and we were watching it and I was like [gasps] okay!

Malia @catfishingwords

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss_Me,_Guido

So I, um, I sadly will probably never be able to think of a “ring of keys” moment that I’ve had, because me being fairly neurodivergent, I just, social cues [gestures] right over my head, so I never would have picked up on that if I would have met anyone, um…that said, I think my earliest exposure to queerness was Some Like It Hot, uh, the movie, uh the first one, um, back when you could still put that in movies without being political. Um, uh, uh, and I think I also saw The Birdcage fairly early on too but—

Malia @catfishingwords

“Ring of keys” is likely referring to the eponymous song from the Broadway musical adaptation of Alison Bechdel’s Fun Home in which a young Alison sees a butch lesbian wearing a ring of keys at a diner and feels validated for the first time and feels like she’s found someone else like her. Or it could be referring to that original scene in the graphic novel.

https://genius.com/Original-broadway-cast-of-fun-home-ring-of-keys-lyrics

I don’t think there’s been a notable remake of Some Like It Hot ever? It might’ve been a mixing up of words or something, but I’m not sure what Nick meant by that.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053291/fullcredits

There are two versions of The Birdcage, but he’s probably referring to the 1996 American remake with Robin Williams and Nathan Lane.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115685/

I hadn’t seen The Birdcage till I was like 17 weeks?

[chuckles]

Next question. Go ahead.

Let’s go, let's go from left to right, there's one at the back.

Well, we are going from left to right.

No, there's one in the back.

[Offscreen audience member responds, I assume making a comment and not a question? Nick and James laugh]

[Another audience member speaks]

Yeah, yeah.

Yeah… We actually were talking about that like, not, like last week or something.

Yeah, um—

So was that the question? Okay. So, the question was uh, discussing like, the, the other aspect of Canadian field distribution, which is the—

There’s one, there’s basically one place to be distributed.

Malia @catfishingwords

Cineplex is the dominant movie theater chain in Canada, with reports saying it makes up about 75% of the movie theaters. In comparison, while I couldn’t find a solid percentage for US theater chains, even the most dominant theater chain (AMC) is not nearly as monopolizing.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4471116-cineplex-appears-overlooked-as-many-canadians-focussed-on-amc

https://www.nicecinema.ca/2023/04/11/independents-need-support-with-cineplex-and-zones/

https://www.boxofficepro.com/giants-of-exhibition-2023/

I cannot speak at all to the costs of obtaining film distribution in conventional venues such as cinemas. Obviously, the very basic outline of the traditional process is for a distributor to buy the rights for a film, and then they sell that film to theaters (or streaming platforms, or other venues/platforms) to screen it. I would assume James is generally correct here, only in that a single theater chain comprising that much of a country’s movie screens does lead to homogeneity in what they are willing to buy and screen, but I truly don’t know.

https://sethero.com/blog/film-distribution-explained-the-ultimate-guide-to-selling-your-film/

One place to be distributed.

Whereas in America, you have, I mean, just in, like a block on New York City, you have five different theater chains, whereas Cineplex basically has the monopoly in Canada. There are some like, small art house theaters which will show like, second run movies and stuff but like—

They're going away.

Yeah, they're dying off and basically everything is Cineplex. So you need to, be able to have the money to be able to get into a Cineplex theater, and that isn't very easy to do when—you first you need like, quite a bit of money, so in order to do that, you basically need in Canada, you need the government funding, and so that's kind of…you’re out of luck there, unless you've got some angel investor in Dubai or something who's just throwing money at you, um.

Well that said, like we may be looking at a new opportunity for that with the internet, and getting things passed around that way. I mean, like it means that—

But even then you do need to be able to, like, if you make a movie that gets onto Netflix Canada, awesome. Well you're not on Netflix US, it might as well not exist.

Yeah.

And so you do need that international distribution, and there's basically nowhere in Canada to, there's basically nowhere in Canada that does international distribution—

Malia @catfishingwords

I think what he means by this is that there are no Canadian film distributors that distribute on a wide international scale, say Warner Bros. Pictures and Universal Pictures which are American companies that have multiple international distribution branches. As far as I could tell, most Canadian distributors distribute either domestic-made films or international films, but don’t have the same kind of reach. The only one I could find that seemed to distribute internationally is Entertainment One (eOne).

https://www.entertainmentone.com/about-eone/?service=film

So—

Let alone and, and, there is only one theater chain in Canada.

What I'm gathering from this, and this is including the early discussion, is that if you are a Canadian creator there is literally no one in this country who is going to help you make your media.

Malia @catfishingwords

Again, there are various public grants as well as tax credits available for filmmakers in development and production stages. I have no idea if the government getting involved in international distribution is a thing.

There's lots of people who will help, just not, like, government.

Well like, who's gonna get it out there, who's gonna like, put it out into the world? I don't mean like, your friend who's gonna you know sit with you and edit your book for free over several months of laborious um, reading out louds over a table, like, I mean like, you know, like, people who are looking to try and make money off of your stuff, there's no one helping you.

Yeah, because there are like in the United States, there are tons of distribution companies that will find a way to put your movie into theaters, specifically because you need a specific theatrical run to be eligible for Oscars, um, and so if they think your movie's good enough, they need to get you into at least one week in New York and LA in order to be considered for Oscars. Um, whereas like…so there's a ton of different distribution companies that can, that can do that, and then there's, you know, home video and streaming and stuff like that, whereas in Canada there's really not a whole lot of distribution companies.

Malia @catfishingwords

Re: Oscars eligibility, that’s generally true though the qualifying cities aren’t just NYC and LA. Oscar eligibility for the Best Picture award is slightly changing though to be tougher about this.

https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/96_general_entry_rules.pdf

https://variety.com/2023/film/awards/oscars-theatrical-expansion-requirements-best-picture-1235651334/

There's, there's Maple, um, which it does mostly, um, uh, uh, horror stuff and a bit of queer stuff, and then there's, there was Alliance Atlantis, but I don't know if they're actually still in business. They basically worked as Warner Brothers distributor in Canada and everything else is American distribution unless you're going through like Crave or something like that.

Malia @catfishingwords

Maple Pictures is defunct currently, since 2011.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maple_Pictures

Alliance Atlantis is also defunct, since 2008. It used to partially own Alliance Pictures (a film distribution company based in Canada), which was later bought by and dissolved into eOne in 2013.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_Atlantis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_Films

There are actually other Canadian film distributors, just in general and not necessarily on the scale of the biggest American distributors, but they do exist and still are running, including eOne, levelFILM, Elevation Pictures, Entract Films, H264, Sphere, and others. There is also the National Film Board of Canada, which also distributes films.

Crave is a Canadian streaming platform that distributes a lot of American TV and films in canada.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crave_(streaming_service)

Okay so, I, I got this all the time because I lived with him for a while, and I spend time with them, but I love hearing you talk about movie politics. I love movie stuff, because it's like listen to a lecture on like um European feudalism like—

[Both laugh]

The film industry is not dissimilar from past years.

I continue to not understand why movies about Hollywood don't make any money, um, because it's basically Game of Thrones.

It's because when Hollywood makes movies about Hollywood, it's very laudatory.

Yeah.

They never actually make movies about Hollywood.

Mmhmm.

Okay.

More questions

Okay.

[Offscreen audience member speaks.]

I've never heard of that.

[Audience member is talking about a historic find? Something pre-modern civilization? Maybe a TV adaptation of something? I don’t know.]

Really?

That does sound interesting.

I'm immediately impressed and interested, so I'm definitely going to check that out. Thank you.

That was quick, can we do one more? Okay.

[Offscreen audience member speaks for a little while.]

Well it’s like, I—So the question was about, um, the contradict—not the contradiction, the contrast of American mythologizing their history, which I like that word.

Malia @catfishingwords

I won’t dispute the claims about Germany publicly funding films about the Holocaust. Germany has quite a bit of public funding available for films in general (including international productions) and it is known that Germany has a lot of active, public memorialization of the victims and impact of the Holocaust. So it would make sense for these two factors to go together. But I can’t find a definitive record on films about the Holocaust funded by the German government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Germany#Film_funding

https://www.ffa.de/files/ffa/AV%20Info-Publikationen%20Downloads/DFFF_GMPF_2022_at_a_glance.pdf

https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/422303/

https://www.gtlaw.com/-/media/files/insights/alerts/alerts-prior-to-march-27-2017/greenberg-traurig_german-film-subsidies_2017.pdf

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/12/holocaust-remembrance-lessons-america/671893/

https://www.dw.com/en/holocaust-remembrance-in-germany-a-changing-culture/a-47203540

https://time.com/5772360/german-holocaust-memory/

When it comes to Canadian funding, there have been publicly funded films that have also covered issues such as residential schools and missing and murdered indigenous women. In general, there are multiple indigenous-made films about indigenous lives and cultures of Canada that were publicly funded. In general, there are public grants and funds specifically dedicated to financing indigenous filmmaking. This is not to say there aren’t still problems of equity and support, but it’s not nothing either.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/indigenous-films-telefilm-canada-funding-1.4737235

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/indigenous-films-funding-boost-telefilm-1.6780014

https://www.nfb.ca/channels/residential-schools/

https://guides.ecuad.ca/c.php?g=716497&p=5120099

https://www.canada.ca/en/services/culture/arts-media/film-video/indigenous-screen-office.html

https://cmf-fmc.ca/program/indigenous-program/

The good and bad, like America will talk about the bad stuff.

Yeah, whereas Canada just sweeps everything good and bad under the rug. Um, yeah.

Mmhmm.

And you're right about the the graves, is that it's nothing that you hadn't already heard about, if you weren't listening to the right people, but like, it's like I, you had this very visceral, visual symbol of something that had been happening, that, there wasn't even really a denial, it just wasn't paid attention to. Um, and so like, is that another reason why Canada just doesn't develop, develop its own content? Because there's this kind of fixation on pretending like our history doesn't exist.

But like, like I said again, it's basically, CanCon is basically Canadian propaganda. Uh, it is like, a very nice word for Canadian propaganda. Not all of it, some of it's actually, really good, but this, most of the stuff from the government is very, that the government will fund is very laudatory of Canada. Um, and so, you know, talking about the, you know, the native school children and the graves, and the stuff like that, they—even though that's something that is like, you know, what I think Americans, and you know, British people, and everyone around the world, that's something they'd be interested in knowing, and…but we are very squeamish to admit that we did anything wrong [Nick interrupts and start to speak and then stops] and I'm kind of like, Germany produces movies about the Holocaust, but we are just very much like, “Yeah, yeah, look Justin Trudeau has the pride flag!”

[Offscreen audience member responds]

Oh yeah, absolutely.

And they're good novels too, why don't they get like, content made about them? Why don't they get—

[Audience member interrupts, can’t make out what they said]

Yes!

Yes!

[Both laugh]

Audience Talk

Malia @catfishingwords

[Important note for the following part of the transcript:

So an audience member starts speaking at length for quite a while, and though I can hear them better than the other times audience members have spoken, it’s still only around 60% legible to me and not good enough to discern what they’re saying word for word or to summarize.

As a matter of transparency, I will leave up the text of the automatically generated Youtube transcription with some attempted passing corrections/edits (which I will underline), sources for what they’re talking about when relevant, and indications when someone else is speaking, but I haven’t cleaned up the sentences to be more coherent because I wouldn’t even know where to start.

The duration of this is 1:07:19 - 1:15:01 and the start/end of this segment is bolded if you would prefer to skip it]

from the 90s so I was literally just like we're not ending as a not talking about Kids in the Hall because um again I agree I was young people so again also I realized generational like I grew up at a time where there's no social media all we could watch yeah and we commonly knew one of the Canadians Canadian food because like they're Canadians we're always doing that

and I know it's part of the generational things as new social media and most of everyone that lives in a bubble has no idea that anything anything because no one knows anything's anything anymore because everyone's speaking their own thing but um Kids in The Hall was so I mean there's stuff in it now that’s not great but um

[laughs]

I think people forget how revolutionary that was how when you think about a comedy group that had somebody who's so openly—

Very openly.

Very openly you know hack characters talk about a lot of political political Canadian things, I still remember Buddy Cole’s analysis of you know the university professor who literally got government funding to try to prove that Asian people are naturally smaller because they have small penises, and black people are naturally huge because they had big penises the government funding was going to use that are asking people who are black people what is one of the question people

Malia @catfishingwords

I think maybe they are discussing J. Phillipe Rushton? But I couldn’t find what Kids in the Hall did on this.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/201210/the-pseudoscience-race-differences-in-penis-size

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/201210/personality-intelligence-and-race-realism

[Nick and James laugh]

so so Not only was it political it exposed us a lot to really serious issues happening in the country like Kids in the Hall at its time and its prime was so amazing. Y’know like I mean they had the whole segment of “Screw you taxpayer” they didn't like why is being funded by the government like I mean like being so many things um

so I realized part of part of I have different opinions on things because I've watched this very closely because um I'm somebody who does anti racism training anti-oppression training the issue of history I think is very very neat but also I'm somebody who grew up we, we watched so many things about indigenous communities a lot of things are still being produced it's just that no one knows because maybe now partly generationally forever we don't actually consume what's being produced so it's like again part of it has to be like

so for example like when I'm thinking of really interesting content that's actually been popular abroad I'm thinking of Baroness von Sketch which is like the closest thing I've seen to something that's like Kids in the Hall but also kind of like such a female content or sort of which was hilarious for me to watch as a Canadian I remember I was watching me like “Why do I recognize the showrunners?” look they're friends with my best friend

like I love sort of because again like there's so many things that are just true about the Muslim community but [something indecipherable] community also like it's so Toronto and so many things get filmed in Toronto that are never Toronto and right and that’s what—

Like I said New York looks a whole lot like Toronto a lot of the time.

a lot of the time in Toronto or like I mean I don't know how many people know how many Lifetime movies are filmed this year

It's an industry, it's a whole industry.

[unhearable]

Not in Perth, but in Carleton Place. Perth doesn’t, Perth doesn’t let them, Perth is very stringent.

[Talking?]

Sorry?

sorry one of the things and actually goes back to music the music is not controlled as much

Yeah

Mmhmm.

and focus no the financing but part of it is actually real closing everything including including uses our food prices this is a highly monopolized country

Yeah.

Yeah.

right and so that's quite a simple thing is actually way more serious than me and then when you're talking about cancer I'm sorry the bigger

Well just look at [???] like especially, especially—

[more things I can’t hear] like but Canadians don't, the English Canadians don’t watch Canadian film and when I think about like the films I had to watch that anywhere Canadians like in the 80s and 90s I was like these films are such pretentious art house crap and like I love my pretentious art house crap like it was bad except Atom Egoyan films right um

I love you know which so when you actually start looking closely this dusting station around the camera I don't actually believe that I think the reality is that a lot of times people are making stuff that's not necessarily very accessible or not a lot of many things

which I actually think maybe because I just live my whole life in such a government town is because I actually do think our country doesn't necessarily want us to have or like if I more complicated conversations around things um so for example if you look at the situation with like um intermediate for example that literally won awards in Korea

Malia @catfishingwords

I couldn’t make out or find by searching online what films they’re talking about.

Yeah.

I don't know people know this but like they know people who are easily there okay like like um but it would velocity was cut off because of such ridiculousness and you know related to PVC and whole Toronto the deeply incestuous Toronto act you know industry scene so I think some things have to do with hardly even the incestuousness of a lot of things so much is like little little empires little people yeah

but another issue is also do English-speaking Canadians want to conceive being a Serene because part of what you're talking about is also people need to want to see Canadian stories for Canadian stories if so many Canadians don't think it's important to do that and aren't even really interested in their history

because part of what I was listening to what I realized that because I'm not white I've actually sought out so much more Canadian content and literature because so many people who are not white are also queer and produce all this like content in Canada but if you're not from those communities you're not seeking out like it's because we seek it out

Right.

um but I do think a lot of your average Canadian it's not it's not seeking it out they're not they don't why would they not understand them not being represented because it was like well it was white, bunch of white Canadians do some people say we're working with the white Canadians do something that's right American you don't see that you don't seek it out um

[Second audience member talks, unhearable]

[Third audience member speaks, something about distribution in Europe?]

But also, I don’t want to go on a tangent, but our murders are awesome

[Both Nick and James laugh]

um our murders are amazing and so interesting and again I love watching because Quebec just make so many things like at one point like they just had to pull this whole thing and build a solicit but if the whole thing is about murder at one point this murder is happening in Quebec and I'm like you literally haven't even got it but even when you think about it like the murders that happen the serial killer the police didn't even bother to find—

Yeah.

specifically targeting mainly people of color completely people didn't even have statuses like how is that not a miniseries right now yeah that would be watched internationally and that's what I'm saying it's not really weird but I don't actually think anyone really cared even about people watching it

Malia @catfishingwords

Unsure what serial killer they’re talking about.

and part of it might just be the nepotism of just lot of people who are not very diverse don't understand how people watch things because I would say a lot of these stories are great if you're breaking love but also particularly stories that involve people who are not white so basically something you can't get from America

like it tends to be in situation like the sort of situation are actually going to make a bunch of money internationally but I do think there's a lack of will not just because they go on a finance but because they actually the people making decisions is such an incestuous group of limited amount of people that they don't actually want to do that

Final Part

I think that we are sitting on the precipice of like, 15 or more very serious media related problems, and that's why I have such a hard time having these discussions is because it's like, okay which one you focus on? How do you talk about how they all interact with each other? And so when it comes to, I really like, what you said about, um, you said a lot [laughs] um, what she said about the way that there isn't an interest in it or like, you know, the powers that be don't want to push that, and they don't want people to think about that, and the thing about propaganda is, Pulp Fiction versus Forrest Gump.

Malia @catfishingwords

While not an exact or objective metrics of legacy or current discourse, Forrest Gump has over 2.5 million views on Letterboxd and over 2 million ratings on IMDB. It was also chosen for the United States National Film Registry.

https://letterboxd.com/film/forrest-gump/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109830/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrest_Gump

Yeah.

Um, who, who talks about Forrest Gump these days? You have one movie that is basically celebrating American identity to the point of fetishization, and another movie that is challenging America and the concept of America in an incredibly subversive way. Um, the good stories are always more subversive, they're always more challenging. When stories conform to existing narratives of power they pass off for propaganda really easily.

So, of course, a body within the government, that their sole mandate is to promote the objective of the government, isn't going to approve stories that challenge the government, or the establishment powers, because then that would be approving its own defeat, um, and that's kind of where I go for on that tangent. But, um, in terms of, about audiences, and, you know, people being interested in, especially on different like, race lines or something, it is a matter of like, what people have exposure to. Like I said about reading I, I don't consume media very quickly, so I have to be very selective about that, so I'm going to gravitate towards media that I heard about, and I don't really have any social circles, um.

Audience member: [Responds, unintelligible]

Yeah, well like that, that's one of the 15 issues that's kind of tackling into this, it's like, we're living in a very difficult time and breaking these patterns is going to be difficult, and that's why I focus less about Canadians creating things because I'm sure there are so many Canadians that are doing really amazing things under the Canadian flag and doing it very well, but because they don't have the ability to compete with American distribution, American advertising, American airwaves, especially American media's domination over the Internet, which is something I don't think there's a whole lot of research into, but I think there needs to be.

Um, it's difficult for me to kind of latch on to anything that I may like. And in regards to art house things I saw The Northman once and that was enough.

And like I, I completely, I'm a true crime junkie, like—

I'm the only gay who isn't, James.

Like, the, I am convinced that the fact that there has not been a, like, a series about the Bruce McArthur murders is because of what the people he killed looked like. Like, there is a, there's a Netflix series, it's a docu-series and those murders got a two-parter in it. People were talking about it all over Twitter and there is like nothing about it in Canada, and it's, I think again, that sort of propaganda idea of “Oh, we don't want to talk about that because that makes us look racist and bad,” and it's like, or you can point out “Yes—”

Malia @catfishingwords

James is talking about a series of murders by Bruce McArthur (a white gay man) that took place in 2010 - 2017 in Toronto that targeted gay and queer men. Most of the victims were of Central and South Asian descent. The Netflix series he’s referring to would be the second season of Catching Killers in 2022.

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), a public broadcaster, has helped produce and air multiple media pieces on the murders, including documentaries, a podcast series, and a docudrama series.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%932017_Toronto_serial_homicides

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catching_Killers#Season_2_(2022)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%932017_Toronto_serial_homicides#Media_coverage

Audience member: [Responds]

“It would.”

I, I, I—

Like that's an HBO miniseries waiting to happen, they made Dahmer, like, Jesus.

Malia @catfishingwords

To be clear, Netflix produced Dahmer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahmer_%E2%80%93_Monster:_The_Jeffrey_Dahmer_Story

Yeah, and they would hopefully make it way better than that.

Yes. [laughs] Don't let Ryan Murphy near it.

[Both laugh]

He's still salty about that.

[Audience member responds]

Yeah.

[Both laugh]

[Facilitator comes up and ends the talk and announces other upcoming Pride-themed events.]

🔙 Back to index